Judgment text0% read
Browse the contents
Case details
| Case reference as listed | Civil Appeal 128/2016 |
|---|---|
| Caption / parties as listed | Mrs. Aziz Ara Rahman Vs Rajdhani Unnayan Kartipakkha (RAJUK) and others |
| Court | Supreme Court of Bangladesh — Appellate Division |
| Case reference year | 2016 |
| Court website upload date | 2024-05-30 |
Additional reference in the official index
(Civil Appeal 128 of 2016)
Court index description — excerpt
• Fresh consideration of title of the respondent No.5 in disputed plot which has already been decided earlier by the High Court Division in Writ Petitions No.11099 of 2006 and 3030 of 2005 is barred by the principle of res judicata. • Any previous decision on a matter in controversy in a legal proceeding including writ petition decided after full contest by the parties or after affording fair opportunity to the parties to prove their case will operate as res judicata in a subsequent regular suit. […]
Read the complete description in the official index ↗
The date above is the court website’s upload date. Read the official document for the full decision.