Skip to content
Bangladesh · Law & legal research
Skip to resource text
Judgmentain.bd library

Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Communication, (at present Ministry of Railway), Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka vs Sher-E-Bangla Market Dokander Bohumukhi Samabay Samity Limited, represented by its Secretary, Abdur Rashid Howlader and others

Civil Appeal 173/2016 · Appellate Division · Court website upload: 2024-03-04.

ReferenceCivil Appeal 173/2016Recorded year2016Court / institutionSupreme Court of Bangladesh — Appellate DivisionEntry added2 Nov 2026
Judgment text
Browse the contents

Case details

Case reference as listedCivil Appeal 173/2016
Caption / parties as listedGovernment of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Communication, (at present Ministry of Railway), Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka vs Sher-E-Bangla Market Dokander Bohumukhi Samabay Samity Limited, represented by its Secretary, Abdur Rashid Howlader and others
CourtSupreme Court of Bangladesh — Appellate Division
Case reference year2016
Court website upload date2024-03-04
Additional reference in the official index

(From the judgment and order dated 5th of March, 2012 passed by this Division in Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 15 of 2011.)

Court index description

In view of the above facts and circumstances, the writ petitioner Samity is not entitled to get any relief, and the High Court Division committed serious error in making the Rule absolute and earlier this Division also failed to consider this fact that a valuable public property is going be sold in favour of a private party, by resorting forgery in collusion with the officials of the concerned Ministry. It is pertinent to mention here that earlier the resolution of 26th Board meeting of the railway authority was not brought to the notice of this Division and if the same was produced before this Court then result would have been otherwise.

The date above is the court website’s upload date. Read the official document for the full decision.

Official Supreme Court index entry ↗

Continue your research

More in this collection

View collection →
Your reading workspace

Contents & tools

Text size100%

Browse the document

Copy this resource reference