Judgment text0% read
Browse the contents
Read the full judgment on the Supreme Court website ↗
Case information
| Court | Supreme Court of Bangladesh — High Court Division |
|---|---|
| Case reference | Criminal Appeal(H) 120/2024 |
| Case-reference year | 2024 |
| Case type | Criminal Appeal(H) |
| Court website upload date | 11-OCT-26 |
The case-reference year is not the judgment year. The court website upload date is not a judgment date.
Official index description
Source: Supreme Court official index.
The convict appellant demanded Tk.1,00,000/- for business purpose from his wife (complainant); therefore we are of the firm view that the prosecution failed to prove that the convict appellant demanded money as dowry at the relevant time of the occurrence. Therefore, the alleged demand of money of Tk. 1,00,000/- does not fall within the purview of the definition of dowry contemplated in section 2(ঞ ) of the Ain.