Judgment text0% read
Browse the contents
Read the full judgment on the Supreme Court website ↗
Case information
| Court | Supreme Court of Bangladesh — High Court Division |
|---|---|
| Case reference | Civil Revision 4319/1997 |
| Case-reference year | 1997 |
| Case type | Civil Revision |
| Court website upload date | 14-SEP-26 |
The case-reference year is not the judgment year. The court website upload date is not a judgment date.
Official index description
Source: Supreme Court official index.
A doubtful, unproved or legally infirm document cannot constitute the juridical foundation of title, and, in the absence of a prima facie title, an adverse entry in the record-of-rights, even if alleged to be erroneous, cannot ipso facto confer upon the plaintiff any declaratory or possessory right. Qui sentit commodum, sentire debet et onus (i.e., he who enjoys the benefit must also bear the burden) has no application to create a proprietary right where its legal source itself remains unproved.