Judgment text0% read
Browse the contents
Read the full judgment on the Supreme Court website ↗
Case information
| Court | Supreme Court of Bangladesh — High Court Division |
|---|---|
| Case reference | Civil Revision 2856/2016 |
| Case-reference year | 2016 |
| Case type | Civil Revision |
| Court website upload date | 31-JUL-25 |
The case-reference year is not the judgment year. The court website upload date is not a judgment date.
Official index description
Source: Supreme Court official index.
In case of a colourable transaction, the onus of proof is entirely lies upon the party, who assert that the transfer is a sub-kabala in disguise of a deed of exchange/re-conveyance under section 101 and 103 of the Evidence Act [I of 1872]. That the deed-in-question is purely a deed of reconveyance, not a sub-kabala and as such it is not pre-emptable under the ambit of section 96 of the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act, 1950.