Judgment text0% read
Browse the contents
Read the full judgment on the Supreme Court website ↗
Case information
| Court | Supreme Court of Bangladesh — High Court Division |
|---|---|
| Case reference | Civil Revision 1282/2008 |
| Case-reference year | 2008 |
| Case type | Civil Revision |
| Court website upload date | 11-MAR-25 |
The case-reference year is not the judgment year. The court website upload date is not a judgment date.
Official index description
Source: Supreme Court official index.
“If the question is whether the deed is genuine or not, the simple answer is, it being a registered document, is showered with a strong presumption as to genuineness. Sections 59, 79, and 144 of the Evidence Act also lend support to section 60 of the Registration Act on this score. No doubt, this presumption is rebuttable, It is the settled proposition of law that in a suit for cancellation of a deed/ setting aside a decree passed by a competent court, it is incumbent upon the plaintiff to prove by cogent evidence that the decree/deed was obtained by fraud practicing. it is well settled that in the determination of the question of facts, parties should not be allowed to lead evidence without proper pleadings.