Skip to content
Bangladesh · Law & legal research
Skip to resource text
Judgmentain.bd library

Pubali Bank Limited vs Chowdhury Shamim Hamid and another

Criminal Petition 1059/2024 · Appellate Division · Court website upload: 2024-07-09.

ReferenceCriminal Petition 1059/2024Recorded year2024Court / institutionSupreme Court of Bangladesh — Appellate DivisionEntry added2 Nov 2026
Judgment text
Browse the contents

Case details

Case reference as listedCriminal Petition 1059/2024
Caption / parties as listedPubali Bank Limited vs Chowdhury Shamim Hamid and another
CourtSupreme Court of Bangladesh — Appellate Division
Case reference year2024
Court website upload date2024-07-09
Additional reference in the official index

(Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No.1059-1061 of 2024)

Court index description

Section 138A of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 has a `non-obstante` clause which has an overriding effect over general provisions contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure as regards preferring appeal against the order of sentence. A convict under Section 138(1) of the Negotiable Instruments Act is not entitled to get bail under Section 426(2A) of the Code of Criminal Procedure on condition of preferring appeal against the order of sentence unless he deposits 50% of the total cheque amount before preferring appeal as prescribed under Section 138A of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The date above is the court website’s upload date. Read the official document for the full decision.

Official Supreme Court index entry ↗

Continue your research

More in this collection

View collection →
Your reading workspace

Contents & tools

Text size100%

Browse the document

Copy this resource reference