Browse the contents
Case details
| Lead case reference on official PDF cover | CIVIL APPEAL NO.76 OF 2008 |
|---|---|
| Caption / parties as listed | Bhadu Pramanik, son of Late Badal Pramanik being dead his legal heirs are-1.Md. Paran Ali Pramanik and others =vs= Md. Abbas Ali Pramanik |
| Court | Supreme Court of Bangladesh — Appellate Division |
| Case reference year | 2008 |
| Court website upload date | 2022-12-20 |
| Original index reference | Civil Appeal /2008 |
Additional reference in the official index
(From the judgment and order dated 08.05.2006 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.2495 of 1990)
Court index description
It is a settled principle of law that the plaintiff if attempts to establish assert, claim or plead something who must prove it appropriately. The same cannot be assumed from the defects or lacking of the defendant side. Here, in this case the plaintiff-respondent must prove his case solely and wholly and he is not allowed to stand to have a decree upon the lacuna of the defendant-appellant. High Court Division committed error of law in disturbing the concurrent findings of facts arrived at by both the Courts below and on misreading of the evidence on record.
The date above is the court website’s upload date. Read the official document for the full decision.