Judgment text0% read
Browse the contents
Read the full judgment on the Supreme Court website ↗
Case information
| Court | Supreme Court of Bangladesh — High Court Division |
|---|---|
| Case reference | Civil Rule 166/2015 |
| Case-reference year | 2015 |
| Case type | Civil Rule |
| Court website upload date | 25-AUG-26 |
The case-reference year is not the judgment year. The court website upload date is not a judgment date.
Official index description
Source: Supreme Court official index.
The effect of section 28A of the Arpita Sampatti Protyarpan Ain, 2001, therefore, is that a property included in the Kha Schedule on the Gazette loses its character as vested property and is deemed never to have been included in the vested-property list. However, such cancellation does not, by itself, confer title upon any private claimant; the title, possession or other rights in respect of the property may still be determined in accordance with the prevailing law. The provision also preserves the right of the Government or any person to seek an appropriate remedy under the prevailing law in respect of any right, title or interest in the property.