Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Housing and Public Works, Bangladesh Secretariat, Shahbag, Dhaka and others -Versus- Belal Uddin, represented by his Constituted Attorney Murtaza Zakir Hossain

Case details

Case reference as listed	Civil Appeal 375/2015
Caption / parties as listed	Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Housing and Public Works, Bangladesh Secretariat, Shahbag, Dhaka and others -Versus- Belal Uddin, represented by his Constituted Attorney Murtaza Zakir Hossain
Court	Supreme Court of Bangladesh — Appellate Division
Case reference year	2015
Court website upload date	2024-07-02

Court index description

Therefore, the irresistible inference which follows that in any course of event the bounden duty to be discharged by the claimant for taking out a property from the clutch of ‘abandoned property’ has been time and again decided in one line. Though it will be repetition but still we want to reiterate that it is the claimant who shall have to prove to the hilt that the property in question is not an abandoned property. In the instant case the petitioner could not prove that his transferor Anwara Ahammed Chowdhury was present at the relevant time as required under law and interpreted by several decisions as discussed above.

The date above is the court website’s upload date. Read the official document for the full decision.

Official Supreme Court index entry ↗