Browse the contents
Case details
| Lead case reference on official PDF cover | CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.30 OF 2015 |
|---|---|
| Caption / parties as listed | Md. Akbar Ali alias Jelhaque Mondal Vs The State and another |
| Court | Supreme Court of Bangladesh — Appellate Division |
| Case reference year | 2015 |
| Court website upload date | 2022-08-29 |
| Original index reference | Criminal Appeal(A) /2015 |
Additional reference in the official index
(WITH JAIL PETITION NO.08 OF 2015 From the judgment and order dated 14.09.2014, 15.09.2014 and 16.09.2014 passed by the High Court Division in Death Reference No.57 of 2009, Criminal Appeal No.6013 of 2009 and Jail Appeal No.566 of 2009.)
Court index description — excerpt
Usually in the matter of this nature, testimony of the injured is sufficient to prove the case of the prosecution. An injured witness would not allow the real culprit to escape from rigors of law and falsely implicate her innocent husband. Evidence of injured witness has evidentiary value and unless compelling reasons exist, his/her evidence is not to be discarded 8 lightly. Section 134 of the Evidence Act has categorically laid it down that “no particular number of witnesses shall in any case be required for the proof of any fact.” Testimony of a solitary witness can be made the basis of conviction. […]
Read the complete description in the official index ↗
The date above is the court website’s upload date. Read the official document for the full decision.