Judgment text0% read
Browse the contents
Read the full judgment on the Supreme Court website ↗
Case information
| Court | Supreme Court of Bangladesh — High Court Division |
|---|---|
| Case reference | Criminal Revision 1909/2021 |
| Case-reference year | 2021 |
| Case type | Criminal Revision |
| Court website upload date | 15-MAR-26 |
The case-reference year is not the judgment year. The court website upload date is not a judgment date.
Official index description (excerpt)
Source: Supreme Court official index.
The court did not arrived at any independent in finding as to metter the injury was grievious hurt and simple hurt on which injury grievious hurt and which in simple hurt to convict the accused petitioner under Section 326 of the Penal Code, the court must come to definite finding with reference to evidence on the record that the injury caused by the accused is a grievious hurt. An injury is grievous hurt if it falls within the meaning of grievous hurt as given in Section 320 of the Penal Code. there is no iota of evidence on record to show that the victim ever sustained permanent privation of sight of either eye, privation of hearing of either ear, privation of any member of joint destruction or permanant impairing of powers or any member of joint, permanant disfiguration of the head of face and in view of such facts and circumstances, we are unable to believe the contention of the prosecution that the injury sustained by the victim come under the mischief of section 326A or 326 of the penal code. the doctor, who issued the certificate, though, according to the prosecution,
[Excerpt ends; the complete index description is retained in the catalogue JSON.]