Browse the contents
Case details
| Lead case reference on official PDF cover | CIVIL APPEAL NO. 222 OF 2016 |
|---|---|
| Caption / parties as listed | Mosammat Asma Khatun being dead his heirs: Md. Anisur Rahman and others vs Md. Abdul Karim being dead his heirs Rahman and others |
| Court | Supreme Court of Bangladesh — Appellate Division |
| Case reference year | 2016 |
| Court website upload date | 2023-12-14 |
| Original index reference | Civil Appeal /2016 |
Additional reference in the official index
(From the judgment and order dated 12.06.2012 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.1725 of 2007)
Court index description — excerpt
The expression “date fixed for the performance” is a crystalized notion. When a date is fixed it means that there is a definite time fixed for doing a particular act. The date fixed for the parties for performance of the agreement should be ascertained on the basis of terms and conditions of the contract. In a case, where no time for performance was fixed, the court had to find out the date, on which, the plaintiff had noticed that the performance had been refused by the defendants. It was the attempt of the plaintiff to get benefit of the second limb of Article 113 of the first schedule to the Limitation Act. […]
Read the complete description in the official index ↗
The date above is the court website’s upload date. Read the official document for the full decision.