Judgment text0% read
Browse the contents
Read the full judgment on the Supreme Court website ↗
Case information
| Court | Supreme Court of Bangladesh — High Court Division |
|---|---|
| Case reference | Civil Revision 5453/2023 |
| Case-reference year | 2023 |
| Case type | Civil Revision |
| Court website upload date | 01-FEB-26 |
The case-reference year is not the judgment year. The court website upload date is not a judgment date.
Official index description
Source: Supreme Court official index.
The provisions under section 8 of the Acquisition and Requisition of Immovable Property Ordinance, 1982 clearly stipulates that while making the award the Deputy Commissioner must determine the compensation on matters as mentioned in section 8 of the Ordinance. If any person interested challenges the determination of the compensation made by the Deputy Commissionerunder section 8(1)(a) of the Ordinance,he/she is required to prove that the average value of the properties of similar description and with similar advantages in the vicinity during the 12 months preceding the date of publication of the notice under section 3 was higher than that of determined by the Deputy Commissioner and if such aggrieved party challenges other matters in determining compensation as mentioned in section 8, sub-section (1) clause Nos. (b)-(f) and sub-section (2) of the Ordinance he must prove that while making the award the Deputy Commissioner did not determine the compensation on matters as mentioned in those Clause Nos. (b)-(f) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2) of section 8.